Annoyed

There have been a few times on this blog where Denis Pitcher goes on a rant about toursim numbers and cruise ships etc... Originally I was goign to respond to the post under the Grad Statistics, but I guess it makes more sense to start a new one.

Denis Pitcher is off in left field someways but thats not surprising. At least he went through the numbers so i must give him some credit.

Air Arrivals are DOWN from 1998, that much is a fact. Hotels beds are DOWN from 1998, that is a fact. Bermuda is 'sold out this summer', that is a fact. If you want more air arrivals you have to build more hotels so the people coming on the plane have a place to stay.

If we're sold out during our peak season, does it NOT make sense to add additional visitors by cruise ships? I'm sure that bartenders, taxi drivers, store owners, and restaurants aren't complaining. I cannot fathom why anyone would even have this arguement that for some reason we should start saying no to cruise visitors, when bermuda hotels are SOLD OUT. Of course these are the same people who will protest Southlands but applaud an expansion of the Reefs.... indeed (Not including you in that one D Pitcher).

Onion please feel free to give me an ecomonic debate, i'm ready for it!

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yes, it does make sense to

Yes, it does make sense to not add additional visitors by cruise ship when they take valuable resources away from much higher value added air travelers.

Not only that, but it probably doesn't improve quality of life to ad-hoc add more than one additional hotel if they come with an extra few hundred low-skill staff and at the cost of our ability to produce additional housing, our natural environment, and without providing meaningful benefit to the bottom-end of the employment spectrum.

This isn't condemn cruise ships or additional hotels, only that we should understand the cost/benefit and have a strategy that realistically aims to maximize benefit to Bermudians without imposing heavy costs on things that really drive value (like air arrivals or natural beauty).

Oscurobranson...

...if it is factual that the hotels in Bermuda are sold out for the summer than I have to ask the question, "Why are people like Denis, DeOnion, etc. are beeing so critical of the Government for trying to increase cruise visitors? I fully agree with you, if hotel rooms are unavailable and Bermuda wants to re-emerge as a tourism destination than cruise passengers are the way to go, what better way to get people who may not otherwise consider Bermuda to come and experience the Island and return at another point as air arrivals.

While I agree that cruise passengers are not the ones to add a whole lot to the economy, they do add something and should not be ignored. At this point in its re-development Bermuda can ill afford to turn cruise passengers away. The only time I would hope Bermuda does not look to attract increased cruise numbers is when it has at least reached a point where its available beds is back to the 3,800 or so it had when at its peak in tourism. Once that inventory is available and occupancy rates are at or exceed the high 80% rate than the focus on cruise passengers can cease or be reduced.

I would be very interested in seeing a response from Denis and DeOnion on this topic.

...because cruise visitors

...because cruise visitors lower the standard of care given to high-value clients, making there fewer of them. So with a limited number of taxis and such we can either a) serve 10 cruise families at $60 dollars a day value added, or a marginally smaller number of air arrivals/businesspeople/expats who add an order of magnitude more value per person per day.

Basically it's a case of going after the low hanging fruit - which in this case are the premium travelers.

This Needs to Be Read - over and over ...

Charges? What charges?

Opinion by Calvin Smith

As the election campaign heats up, I am asked almost daily, “Calvin what is the PLP doing about the corruption charges? My standard reply is “What charges?” After a surprised look from my questioner, I ask again, “What charges?” Another puzzled look followed quickly by the response “Calvin, you know what I mean. I’m talking about the scandal at the Bermuda Housing Corporation.” I reply, “You’ll have to ask Michael Dunkley about that. He seems to know more about what occurred at BHC than the law enforcement officers who investigated the case.” The BHC case is the ultimate demonstration of the new UBP strategy. That is to portray the leadership of the PLP as greedy, corrupt and incompetent. The incompetence charge can be dismissed very easily. The PLP has been characterised as incompetent by the UBP ever since the party was inaugurated in 1963. It is a charge that has never required validation by the accusers. The incompetence of blacks is a well established legacy in Bermuda resulting from our long history of slavery and segregation. What is cause for deep concern is that the UBP continues to go to that well of hate and contempt to formulate its current election strategies.

In the lead-up to the 1998 election, the core of the UBP campaign was that if the PLP were elected, the international companies would flee. This was partly correct. The international companies did flee. However the flight was from wherever they were to a Bermuda led by the Progressive Labour Party.

Further, Bermuda’s own major investors have shown no fear with respect to the PLP ascendancy to power. This fact is reflected in the numerous major buildings that are growing up all over the city and elsewhere in Bermuda. This construction activity involves upgrading of existing business facilities as well as substantial investment in the creation of entirely new office and residential structures. Clearly, although the political leadership of the UBP may claim that the PLP are incompetent, the businessmen who support the UBP certainly have no fears about investing in Bermuda’s future under the PLP government. Of special interest is the fact that foremost among the willing investors in a new Bermuda is former UBP leader and Premier, Sir John Swan.

The PLP have more than justified the faith shown in them by the Business community. No sooner were the charges of corruption made by the current leader of the UBP Mr. Michael Dunkley, then premier Dame Jennifer Smith asked the governor to investigate the charges. (This approach was necessary since we are a colony and the governor in responsible for internal security). His Excellency, Sir John Verreker responded by appointing the leading officers in the field of criminal activity to look into the BHC affair. These were the Commissioner of Police, the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Justice.

These three men thoroughly investigated the operations of the Bermuda Housing Corporation with the assistance of officers from Scotland Yard, one of worlds most effective law enforcement agencies. After several months, the investigating officers issued their report declaring that no crime had been committed by members of the Cabinet whom the UBP had claimed were corrupt and involved in fraud. However, at least one of the three investigating officers stated that although the actions of the Cabinet Ministers were not illegal, they could be said to be unethical. The UBP lost no opportunity to run with the alleged lack of ethics and declared that the matter should be investigated by a Royal Commission.

At this point, the whole issue converts into a comedy worthy of Shakespeare. The highest ranking government officer in Bermuda is the Governor and he alone has the legal responsibility for the maintenance of Law and Order on behalf of the Government of England. As they say colloquially, “He is the man.” “The man” had investigated the involvement of cabinet members with the charges of corruption at BHC and found them guilty of no crime. The governor’s acceptance of the findings was justified since it had been carried out by the most competent legal officers operating in Bermuda assisted by Scotland Yard, the foremost law enforcement officers operating in England.

However the leader of the Opposition, Mr. Michael Dunkley, was not satisfied. He dismissed the findings of the investigative team and demanded that a Royal Commission be appointed to look into the matter. The fact that the members of the United Bermuda Party have accepted the dictates of Mr. Dunkley without question, suggests that either the membership of that party is abysmally ignorant or are willing partners in the BOLDEST FRAUD attempt in the history of the British Parliamentary System.

Did I say BOLDEST FRAUD? Yes I said that because it should be clear to all, that in order to have a Royal Commission appointed, Mr. Dunkley must apply to his Excellency, Sir John Vereker, governor of Bermuda. But if Sir John accedes to this demand, he must acknowledge that the investigative officers that he appointed were incompetent and that he, the governor, was wrong when he accepted the report of these incompetents. Surely, if Mr. Dunkley really believes that the officers appointed by the governor to investigate the BHC affair were incompetent, he should be insisting on the resignation of these officers, like his party is currently doing with respect to the Minister of Planning. After all, how can Bermudians continue to have faith in the ability of these officers, if their investigative and analytical skills are so obviously defective that the leader of the opposition is prepared to demand that Governor Sir John Vereker should reverse his original support of their findings and appoint a Royal Commission to correct their botched-up job?

This leads to the question, if Mr. Dunkley is prepared so casually to refute the decision of Her Majesty’s official representative in this colony, he must be quietly preparing to seek independence from England should his party win the next General Election. This would not be a new behaviour of the UBP. Remember, when Sir John Swan attempted to take the UBP into independence even though his party was against independence during the lead up to the general election which had just ended.

It should be obvious to any thinking person that Mr. Dunkley’s call for a Royal Commission is just one more attempt to discredit Bermuda’s most effective political leader, Premier Dr. Ewart Brown. Any student of management would recognise instantly that Dr. Brown possesses in abundance, all the key qualities of leadership: Intelligence, courage, integrity and a risk taker.

The fact that the UBP recognise these qualities in Dr. Brown explains why they are taking every opportunity to discredit him. This is not a new tactic for the UBP and their antecedents. Those of us who are close to the political scene know that this tactic has been used to destroy all persons who have dared to advocate real political change. We need only recall the continuous personal attacks on the late Dr. E. F. Gordon, that heroic advocate of fundamental change in Bermuda.

Today, Bermuda has another Doctor advocating fundamental change, the Honourable Dr. Ewart Brown. Can we expect any less destructive attacks on him than was true for Dr. E. F. Gordon? However, PLP supporters and those of us who see the need for fundamental change must take serious steps to defend Dr. Brown from the vicious attacks that will no doubt continue to be made by the opposition

A good piece, except

1. His assertion that Dunkley is pro-indenpendence is an illogical leap and red herring in an otherwise well thought out article. It's facetious and useless.

2. This, and the vast majority of posts/thoughts by PLP supporters all say the same thing. There was an investigation. No illegal acts were found. Get on with it. Sure, there was some unethical stuff, but don't worry about it. It's fine. It's just unethical. Can you find out what that was? No of course not, no one was found guilty. What were the unethical things? No one was found guilty. Why can't we see it? No one was found guilty, why would you want to. Well can you at least be honest with the electorate and speak about why these 'unethical acts' were justified? No one was found guilty.

As long as no one was found guilty, no one should care. Right?

But DeOnion...

...as Bermuda is now going through a rebirth and we clearly do not have the hotel room inventory, attracting cruise passengers is a way to get people to experience Bermuda and hope they will return as air arrivals when the hotel room inventory has been increased enough to accomodate them.

I am not saying for one minute that cruise passengers are the wave of the future for tourism in Bermuda but as we don't currently have the necessary rooms let's get people here.

I don't understand what your argument is because if we only focus on air arrivals and are successful where are these people going to stay?

Guilden."The only time I

Guilden.
"The only time I would hope Bermuda does not look to attract increased cruise numbers is when it has at least reached a point where its available beds is back to the 3,800 or so it had when at its peak in tourism. Once that inventory is available and occupancy rates are at or exceed the high 80% rate than the focus on cruise passengers can cease or be reduced."

This is exactly the intention of Premier Brown. He discussed this very issue while appearing as a guest on "Hott from the Streets". He said once all the hotels slated to be built are up and running and we are at full capacity in ref to number of beds, the cruise visits will decrease. His thinking is better have some cruise visitors than none at all.

my response

I invite you all to read my response over at my blog.
http://www.21square.com/2007/07/qualitative-or-.html

Denis Pitcher

For the record

Not sure if any of you were in the hospitality industry in 1981, when Bermuda began to experince the demise of the industry, this began when under the UBP an move was inplace to begin to tax the grats of the hotel worker, no longer than a week later the island was shut down when all hotel workers joined a sympathy strike in support of other BIU workers.
Since that time Bermuda Hotel propertises have dropped from109 to just around 53 today with the closer of Belmont, Newstead and Sonesta, this soley begin as Bermuda sort to extract high end customers and the with propertiese begin brought by bottom line companies, all the amenties that Bermuda offered went out the door.
We lost MEAL PLAN DINNING Breakfast and Dinner, Busboys, SILVER SERVICE and all the things that made Bermuda Bermuda.
So now that the numbers are comming back, there is a need to play with the types of visitors, better 100 Cruise Ship Passengers, than 50 Air ARRIVALS.
In all honesty the additional beds will never see us reach over 10,000 again , but it will allow us to compete with the rest of the world, the improvement of our product will also do the same, as long as i have been around the Hospitality Industry its a saying VALUE FOR MONEY something that you truly don't get at this time in Bermuda.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.