I vote yes-I know there are major risk factors for loss revenue on both sides of the coin, but until we find ways to make it affordable and attractive for tourist to spend their money, I vote yes. We need to keep improving our product and lower cost where possible so the tourist come and spend. I want cruise ships remain coming to our shores, but if we don't have what is required of their changing strategy than what solution we will have?
Voted no because I disagree with the intents of the bill itself. If the bill was to legislate organised gambling including casinos in the island then I'd be more likely to favour it, however this appears to be more about placating the cruise ship lines in a way that makes it harder for local businesses to compete. I'd rather see a situation where hotels, for example, can provide casinos with strict requirements and security in place, if you wish to attract tourists to gamble, while any night clubs, comedy clubs, and the like can have a better opportunity to attract both cruise ship and airline visitors (yes the onus is still on local businesses to try to attract crowds, especially in the busier summer season).
Comments
Why?
Why have you voted against it, Jonathan?
Read 'Cruise Ships & Gambling'
I put forward my position in the article 'Cruise Ships & Gambling' also on this site.
Why did you vote for it Rocksolid?
Difficult Subject
I vote yes-I know there are major risk factors for loss revenue on both sides of the coin, but until we find ways to make it affordable and attractive for tourist to spend their money, I vote yes. We need to keep improving our product and lower cost where possible so the tourist come and spend. I want cruise ships remain coming to our shores, but if we don't have what is required of their changing strategy than what solution we will have?
gambling bill itself
Voted no because I disagree with the intents of the bill itself. If the bill was to legislate organised gambling including casinos in the island then I'd be more likely to favour it, however this appears to be more about placating the cruise ship lines in a way that makes it harder for local businesses to compete. I'd rather see a situation where hotels, for example, can provide casinos with strict requirements and security in place, if you wish to attract tourists to gamble, while any night clubs, comedy clubs, and the like can have a better opportunity to attract both cruise ship and airline visitors (yes the onus is still on local businesses to try to attract crowds, especially in the busier summer season).