Crusie Ships & Gambling

I've created a new poll concerning the proposed bill to allow cruise ships to operate their casinos while in port. I feel that this issue is one that we definitely need to debate, and so I'll try to get the ball rolling.

I have voted against allowing the cruise ships to operate their casinos to operate while in port.

In general I am opposed to gambling, especially in the mass comercial sense such as national lotteries and casinos which I see as little more than a scheme to redistribute wealth away from the poorer sections of society and into the coffers of the already well-to-do. While I can understand the argument of allowing these operations with the qualifications that X% of revenue so generated goes into funding social programs, I find such a strategy to be essentially a hidden tax, and one that contributes greater problems than it solves.

I can certainly understand the need to increase tourism, and, yes, this initiative and gambling in general is certainly one option for doing so. However, as we well know, tourism - and the type of tourism in particular - can have profound impacts on our society, economy and ecology, both good and bad. I feel that we should be careful in desigining our tourism strategy in order to encourage 'good' impacts on our society, economy and ecology, and minimise or avoid the negative ones. And 'good' is not simply about generating the most profit; more often than not such an approach comes at the expense of our society and ecology.

'Good' in the economic sense should instead be about ensuring increased economic justice and democracy - equity - and not about maximising the profits of a chosen few, whether they be Blacks or Whites. Furthermore 'good' in the sense of society should seek to increase a sense of community, of solidarity and respect for our heritage, not individualism and crass materialism - bling if you will. Ecologically we should be focusing on appreciating and strengthening our natural ecosystems that both support our existence, and benefit our tourism in the first place through the aestheic beauty of our island.

I am not convinced that gambling, be it full casinos, or on cruise ships, is beneficial in the final analysis to developing our island for the better. Gambling is predicated largely on bling, on individualism and materialism - and heavily on short-term profit. Such mentalities have an impact beyond the purely economic realm and have potentially disastourous consequences for our already degraded society and ecology.

Far better a tourism strategy, perhaps not in the sense of maximising profit, but definitely in the sense of social and ecological good, as well as economic equity and justice, is to focus on alternative tourism approaches. In particular we should be focusing on eco-tourism, cultural tourism and luxury cruise liners. These initiatives bring in far fewer numbers of tourists (and with luxury cruise liners avoid the problems associated with Panamax class vessels), but they have a much greater value in monies generated per tourist than the crass and mass tourism that gambling could generate. What is more, they have the potential to strengthen our socialy, economic and ecological welfare to a far greater degree than gambling tourism can.

Let the Caribbean destroy themselves socially, economically and ecologically with crass tourism, we have no need to join them or keep up with them with visitor arrivals. Such wealth is more illusory and leads to potentially self-destructive social and ecological situations. We would do far better, as a people, to focus on alternative tourism that brings in more value while also strengthening our social, eocnomic and ecological welfare. We should, and can, offer something different to tourists, and profit handsomely from it in real terms.

Gambling tourism is a superficial and damaging tourism strategy, and its profits are not altogether different from Judas's silver - short-term gain in exchange for long-term ruin.

Our focus should be on development, not growth for the sake of growth. Gambling tourism is a false hope four our rejuvenation.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

On this I agree

Well thought out points Jonathan. I actually disagree with allowing gambling for fundamentally different reasons, but share the sentiment.

To me cruise ships are a necessary evil - they should not be the focus of our tourism efforts. I recognise the sheer volumes that they bring in, and how crucial this is to the various stores that survive off of selling things to these masses. That said, I don't see how gambling can really help us in any way.

These cruise ship companies are not solely basing their decision to come to Bermuda on our gambling policies. They're just lobbying for them, because it will help their bottom line. The Bermuda route is unique, and has enough advantages that it has existed for years without gambling. Plus, as soon as the boats are into international waters they throw their money into machines as much as they'd like. It’s only while they’re actually in Bermuda – on the island – that the gambling is prohibited.

So I just don’t get the incentive to us. You’re sitting on a cruise ship after eating your all inclusive meal. It’s 9 oclock. There is a night club on board, but you’ve been there 2 times on the sail over. You look out over Front street, see the bars and clubs with their lights on. If you know you can’t hit the casino, surely that makes going out slightly more attractive? Which is good for locals?

Again, the only argument I can see for gambling being permitted on cruise ships is if the government seriously believe this is a make or break deal. If their bargaining position is so poor that the cruise ship companies can dictate their terms to us. We are in a unique geographic location, we offer a unique journey and a unique island. Those should be our selling points. They’re the reason people have been coming here for years. We don’t need to bend over backwards.

Further

Here are some comments from Alex Scott, whom I agree with on this:
http://www.royalgazette.com/siftology.royalgazette/Article/article.jsp?a...

"This is scheduled to be a "conscience vote" for the Government benches; therefore I am permitted to publicly publish my view that one has to treat as suspect the notion that Bermuda is losing its competitive advantage to other destinations, none of which (to my knowledge) permit gaming in port.

It was not long ago, and I believe it still to be the case, that Bermuda was such an attractive destination that we had the luxury of turning away cruise line companies. I believe still that we possess a strong bargaining chip (if you will pardon the gaming terminology) – without giving away the shop.

When I was Premier I was afforded the high honour of being invited by Prime Minister Patterson of Jamaica to dine with his Cabinet. Once pleasantries had been exchanged, the discussion turned to the decided advantage Bermuda held and holds with the cruise industry over the entire Caribbean region.

While we attract a head-tax of approximately $60 per passenger, the destinations to the south and elsewhere struggle to realise $5, $10 and $15 (at that time).

The Jamaican Ministers were astounded; however, the Prime Minister explained away the disparity by turning to his Cabinet colleagues and declaring simply "Bermuda is different".

In my view this difference will permit the Government and the Minister to negotiate us back into a very attractive position by lowering our head-tax to a rate which will not do a great injury to our coffers while providing our cruise industry partners with a decided marketing incentive for their customers.

This, to my way of thinking, would attract far more revenue for the industry than the promise of dockside gambling, which does not attract any passengers."

Good argument against gambling in Bermuda

Best argument against legislation allowing gambling on the island (or at least, gambling on cruise ships while in port) that I have seen either online or in the print media.

Although TV bingo exists on the island, there are no social programmes that benefit from it that I'm aware of, and operates on the principle that people will take a chance and buy the cards and hope they get lucky. Sounds like gambling.

Now I voted for gaming...

But let me clarify what I was voting for. Cause Jon I think you and I have two different pictures in mind. I do agree with the principle of your argument however, although to varying degrees.

I am thinking about our present situation as well as future trends. I am not against cruise ships having their casinos open between 10pm and 5,6am. If they remain closed between 5.6am to 10pm. With the way we produce the Bermuda project what is there really to do after 10pm besides hang in the bar? Not all tourists hang out in bars nor do all tourists gamble. If tourists have enough income to throw away on machines then let them. They know what they're spend on trinkets and clpthes based on the price of the items in the stores. Not everyone is good at poker or likes putting money in a machine. If the casinos are not in operation during the main business hours and tourists are the only ones with access to these same casinos then I would vote for gambling.

To me the two most important factors are the the Bermudian people and the Bermuda tourism product. Right now we're in an economic downturn and everyone is hurting. We can only deal with so much strain on the two pillars of our economy and we need to ensure that we have cruise ships for St. Georges and Hamilton. We need that right now. We also need to work on improving and diversifying our tourism product so every tourist that comes for eco-tourism, cultural tourism, religious tourism, by boat or by plane have truly memorable experiences that make them want to come again. This is something we can work on now for the future.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.